Feature Stories

FEATURE AND PHOTOGRAPHY GORDON T. SMITH

Having returned from a technical diving trip in Sri Lanka exploring the HMS Hermes in 2017 with the nearest hyperbaric chamber being a fair distance from our place of exploration, our technical dive group had frequent discussions as to what could have been done had any of us been struck down by DCS. Being technical divers and no strangers to contingency planning, it wasn’t long until the suggestion of In Water Recompression (IWR) training came up.

For those of you who are not familiar with the term IWR, this is a rather controversial subject that involves treatment of certain (but not all) cases of Decompression Sickness (DCS), and has many limitations. Nonetheless, given that many of us venture out to distant destinations to dive where the nearest hyperbaric chamber may be many hours, if not days away from our dive destination, this training could in fact be a life saver, in particular where technical diving is concerned since decompression diving does carry certain risks. Our Sri Lankan trip to Batticaloa in May 2017 took us to a rather remote destination, eight hours by road away from Colombo. A very long way to travel should anything go wrong!

Even back in the UAE, where most of us dive the east coast, from Dibba in the north to Fujairah in the south, the nearest hyperbaric chamber available for recreational divers in that area has an additional challenge from Fujairah to Dubai, crossing the Hijar mountains at 500m, which can easily complicate things for a DCS victim, even while on surface oxygen (O2).

Our group of technical divers frequently dive the Ines, Anita and U533, and whilst generally on rebreathers, some of us still dive on Open Circuit. It remains a simple fact that all decompression diving, and even no decompression diving, carries a risk of DCS. Whilst many things can be done to mitigate these risks, such as keeping fit, well hydrated, plan your dive and dive your plan, etc., DCS can still hit anyone who dives, sometimes for no apparent reason.

Well first of all this is not a replacement for proper treatment in a hyperbaric chamber under the watchful eye of a properly trained hyperbaric physician, but more of a band aid in order to mitigate some of the symptoms before transporting a “bent” diver to a chamber.

In fact IWR has been practiced for decades and there is nothing new about it. Commercial divers in Australia (abalone and pearl divers) and Hawaii (spearfishermen) have been practicing this since the 1960s with no specific tables other than initially US Navy tables.

Some hyperbaric physicians have managed to put together protocols and various treatment tables for IWR, and are available such as the Hawaiian tables, however this is not new. In fact use of underwater O2 goes back to the 1960s, and was incorporated into the Royal Australian Navy manual as tables 81 and 82, but it took years before it found its way into the US Navy Diving Manual in the 1970s.

The last major meeting of hyperbaric physicians to discuss this subject was 20 years ago in Seattle, Washington, USA during the forty-eighth workshop of the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society in May 1998. Since then only one training agency has developed a course to address this subject, namely the International Association of Nitrox and Technical Divers (IANTD), written by Joseph Dituri, M.S. and Richard Sadler, M.D.,FACS

So first of all, “do not try this at home!”

And I repeat IWR is not a replacement for treatment in a chamber, and is regarded as more of a temporary fix prior to proper treatment in a chamber and consultation with a hyperbaric trained physician.

IWR is dangerous, and should only be considered as a last resort depending on various factors such as weather and water conditions, available gas to carry out the procedure, including that for other divers who will have to accompany the stricken diver over a long period of time, and lastly (but not least) the condition of the diver.

• Isolated Hearing Loss

• Vertigo

• Hemoptysis (coughing up blood) or coughing up frothy sputum

• Altered consciousness, weakness or any other symptom of such severity that it would prevent safe diving practices (e.g. equipment use)

• Hemodynamic Instability or CPR

• Unsecured Airway (vomiting)

• Suspected Pulmonary Barotrauma

• Poor Volitional Control of equipment or altered mental status

• Relative Hypothermia

• History of Loss of Consciousness

Once the stricken diver has been assessed and suitable for IWR, only then can he/she be put back into the water, provided that sufficient gas and other resources are available plus both weather and water conditions are suitable. However the victim should be put on surface O2 as soon as possible even during the assessment phase.

A phone call to DAN or a local hyperbaric physician should be made once the assessment is completed, for advice and alerting them that a chamber is required and that IWR is planned first.

· Surface Supervisor (SS) – initial assessor of the victim and the person who assumes charge on the surface.

· Note Taker (Scribe) – takes notes while the SS assesses the victim using a standardised format.

· In Water Supervisor (IWS) – responsible for taking care of the victim in the water.

· In Water Tender – basically the gopher, above and below water communicator, and checks that the downline is properly in place.

A weighted marked downline should be used in order to measure as accurately as possible the depth of the “patient”, and the weights should be heavy enough to keep the line as vertical as possible, countering any current

As all divers should be aware, breathing pure oxygen (100%) below 6 metres can cause issues related to oxygen toxicity, which may cause a diver to go into a fit. In a chamber this is easily managed by removing the O2 mask and then when the diver breathes again it is air that enters the lungs. Underwater however, the regulator may fall out of the diver’s mouth and certainly when the diver tries to breathe again, water will enter and drowning is likely.

For this reason a Full Face Mask (FFM) is used. Kirby Morgan makes an excellent FFM (M48) with a regulator attached via a pod that can be removed on the surface allowing a diver to breathe atmospheric air or with a normal second stage regulator in place. As per the usual treatment of masks prior to diving some anti-fogging agent (e.g. Johnsons Baby Shampoo) should be used on the mask lenses as the In Water Supervisor has to be able to communicate with the victim and eye contact is crucial. Some actual practical experience using a FFM is highly recommended, one of the advantages is that you can breathe through your nose as well as your mouth. If it floods for any reason, there is a mouthpiece to use and by breathing out through your nose the water is cleared through a one way valve at the bottom of the mask.

Once the victim is fully kitted up there should be at least one diver in the water ready to receive him/her. The victim should then come off surface supplied O2 and then (with a regulator in place) go back into the water. The diver in the water acting as a tender along with the IWS should then attach the O2 supply (pod on an M48 mask) connected to a switchblock that in turn is connected to a tank of O2. The O2 cylinder should be attached to the victim, before descending to 9m.

When the victim is at 9m and clipped to the downline using a harness to stop him/her from descending further, the time starts for the specific treatment table. Meanwhile a tank of air is connected to the switch-block to enable air breaks between the O2 treatments as per IANTD’s tables. The air tank is also clipped on to the victim, buoyancy has to be adjusted, and the switch-block clipped off too.

The IWS is the main diver taking care of the victim, while the tender acts as a standby diver going between the victim and the surface relaying messages and if necessary bringing additional gas down to the victim. The IWS monitors the victim constantly checking that the victim is fine.

The regulators on the tanks for treatment have Quick Connections on the hoses making it easy to connect and disconnect the tanks to the switch-block underwater. The switchblock allows the IWS to quickly change the breathing gas to air should the victim indicate that he/she is unwell or if the victim suddenly has a fit.

If the victim does have any issues and needs to abort then the IWS will bring him/her to the surface at one foot per minute. Once back on the surface the victim should be put back on O2 and lay supine or in the recovery position.

Wet notes and slates are essential for communication, and use of a weighted line (on a reel) to send messages back and forth is very helpful to maintain communication between the surface and the team below.

Of course none of us want to use IWR if we can avoid it and of the factors that contribute to DCS, two of them are controllable by the diver, temperature and hydration level. Both are short-term conditions over which the diver has a great deal of control.

Drink plenty of fluids prior to diving, and avoid caffeinated drinks whenever possible. It seems obvious but many times here in the UAE in the summer, people drink too little.

In the UAE we can have 40˚C on the surface and 23˚C on the bottom. It’s easy to overheat before a dive and not be prepared for the temperature difference when on the bottom. While technical diving can involve long decompression stops it is easy to lose body heat if not suitably insulated. Many of us use drysuits in the winter, and even in the summer, where we can control our own body temperatures better using different thicknesses of undersuit.

Once again I repeat, do not try this at home (or in the sea) unless properly trained in the use of the equipment, and that includes any potential victim. Someone not trained in IWR should not consider going back into the water for this controversial treatment.

Dr. Simon Mitchell et al has recently published a new paper “Pre-hospital management of decompression illness: expert review of key principles and controversies” published in the Diving Hyperbaric Medicine journal (2018 Mar 31;48(1):45-55) covering IWR therapy.

Summer is here and adventurers who love the outdoors and the ocean understand why it is important that we take steps to reduce the chances of sunburn. More often than not however, people will grab for the sunscreen as the main option. Apart from preventing nasty sunburn, sunscreen has been promoted for years as a product that reduces sun damage.

But what many people do not realise is that some of the most popular sun protection products contain chemical additives that can be harmful not only for ourselves, but also for the environment we enjoy.

When sunscreen washes off, it can leave chemical residues behind that may be harmful to marine life, particularly coral reefs – a concept supported by a 2008 study published in the peer-reviewed journal ‘Environmental Health Perspectives’.

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) in the United States has played a large role in this space for almost 12 years now, annually producing a sunscreen guide that highlights how safe popular sunscreens are. The results over the years have been amazing, with 75% of the products examined offering inferior sun protection or containing worrisome ingredients like oxybenzone, a hormone disruptor, or retinyl palmitate, a form of vitamin A that may harm skin. And despite scant evidence, governments still allow most sunscreens to claim they help prevent skin cancer.

Oxybenzone has been a worrying ingredient in sunscreen for marine conservationists and scientists for years. In 2005, Craig Downs, Ph.D., a forensic ecotoxicologist found that oxybenzone can damage coral DNA and could lead to corals and reef organisms becoming sterile and dying as a result. Not only that, but oxybenzone could be contributing to coral bleaching. “And once those reefs die, we’ve found they’re not coming back,” Downs reported. “They’re just crumbling to dust.”

A recent study found it only takes a tiny amount of toxic sunscreen to kill coral. One drop of sunscreen in 3.9 million gallons/15 million litres of water is all it takes to damage a reef.

The issue has become urgent enough that parts of Mexico have gone so far as to ban products with oxybenzone (which studies have shown is also damaging to sea urchins, fish, and mammals) and other threatening chemicals from its eco-reserves. Additionally, Hawaii has just recently become the first US state to ban the sale of sunscreens containing oxybenzone and octinoxate; two common chemicals found in some of the most popular sunscreens around the world.

The good news is that eco-conscious companies are taking matters into their own hands, formulating sunscreens and hydrating lotions that don’t contain oxybenzone and are (hopefully) less detrimental to the underwater environment.

Since 2007, the EWG has found a dramatic increase in the availability of mineral-only sunscreens, doubling from 17 percent of products to 34 percent in 2017. Sunscreens using zinc oxide and titanium dioxide tended to rate well in their analysis; they are stable in sunlight, offering a good balance between protection from the two types of ultraviolet (UV) radiation – UVA and UVB – and often don’t contain potentially harmful additives.

Additionally, since 2010, the EWG has seen a dramatic decrease in sunscreens containing retinyl palmitate from 40 percent to 14 percent in 2017. Retinyl palmitate has been linked to increased skin tumours and lesions on animals treated with this ingredient and exposed to sunlight.

So what can eco-conscious sun lovers do to help protect and conserve the marine environment they love?

Choose to cover up rather than slather on. A long-sleeved rash guard with UV protection is a better environmental choice than any sunscreen. Additionally, wear suitable shirts, hats and pants that shield your skin from the sun’s ultraviolet rays; reducing burn risk by 27%.

Plan around the sun. Enjoy your outdoor activities early in the morning or in the late afternoon if you can, when the sun is lower in the sky.

Find shade – or make it. Picnic under a tree or take a canopy to the beach. Keep infants in the shade, reducing the risk of multiple burns by 30%.

Read the label: avoid sunscreens containing oxybenzone, butylparaben, octinoxate or 4-methylbenzylidine camphor. Even a small amount can cause coral bleaching.

Avoid getting burned. Red, sore and blistered skin means you’ve gotten far too much sun.

Check the UV Index. The UV Index provides important information to help plan outdoor activities in ways that prevent sun overexposure.

Sunglasses are essential. Not just a fashion accessory, sunglasses protect your eyes from UV radiation.

Apply sunscreen at least 15 minutes before going in the water so the product can absorb into your skin. This also improves its effectiveness.

Rub It In – Don’t Spray It. Opt for SPF lotions and creams instead of sprays, which are more likely to stick to the sand than your skin. When the tide comes in, this chemical-covered sand is then carried out into the ocean, which can lead to additional contamination. Also troubling: When it rains, this sunscreen residue can seep underneath the sand, where sea turtles often lay eggs.

Choose a product without plastic packaging! This is my biggest gripe about sunscreens which people often forget. Plastic is a major concern for ocean environments and is almost in the news daily in terms of its effects on marine animals. There are now sunscreen products available in metal containers, which can be reused afterwards, or better yet, go naked! I mean go without the packaging if you can. Sunblock bars are available on the market and if these didn’t come with the plastic wrapper, they would be perfect!

FEATURE AND PHOTOGRAPHY PATRICK VAN HOESERLANDE

Diving is a hobby with various possibilities. There are plenty of good incentives to take your gear and get underwater. In this new series titled ‘My buddy’, I’m in search of diving enthusiasts who spend their limited time underwater for a special and specific reason. The idea is to demonstrate the enormous possibilities of our favourite sport. For my first article, I’ve fixed a dive with Kiki Vleeschouwers, whom I, after our dive, call a biology sniffing diver.

Our dive site is the ‘Put van Ekeren’. During the preparation of our equipment, I have a look in her dive box. In Belgium, most of the divers use plastic boxes for transportation to protect the inside of the car from the water dripping from our wet dive equipment. I believe that from the equipment you find in one’s box, you can easily make out the kind of diver they are. In Kiki’s case, I find a simple underwater camera, a high quality dive torch and a large magnifying glass. My conclusion after the quick inspection, is it will be slow, easy diving, in search of small things.

Nevertheless, I ask the question on the character of our dive. Her answer, “A long browse around, looking for everything that can be found. I stick to one square metre to explore and investigate all the fauna and flora.” I kind of suspect what that means and I like this type of diving. In my opinion a diver can never swim too slow, only too fast. Her description of the dive does not surprise me, because I knew she liked this kind of dive. As a veterinarian, she’s fond of small animals and that passion also applies for those living underwater. Despite our collaborating on a few diving projects such as a book for youth divers, the Experimental Deep Dive Team… we have never dived together. I’m open to surprises.

When collecting all our things to walk to the point of entry, I notice that she carries long fins. They are the kind of fins you use to cover long distances, fast. I prefer to dive with short, sturdy fins for manoeuvrability accepting the slower speed as a trade-off. I suppress my fear of a speed dive with the thought of the square metre.

We get into the water before the evening rush. I let Kiki lead. After the buddy check, she takes one glance at her compass and starts to glide over the vegetation. Her path is everything except rectilinear, which makes me suspect that she follows her instinct instead of specific magnetic direction.

From time to time she passes some unidentified plant or animal into my hands. I want to ask her what it is, but I realise that our level of sign language doesn’t lend itself to this complicated level of conversation. Suddenly she begins to dig in the sandy bottom clearly looking for something. Judging by her facial expression, she didn’t find what she was looking for.

Farther along, she encourages me to look through her magnifying glass. I’m studying a freshwater isopod through the huge lens. It seems strange that something like this works underwater. Then she hands me a set of shells. I look surprised at their being empty and wonder what is so special about them. Later, during our debrief, she tells me that bivalves are saltwater specimens and thus these had to be fossils. The prehistory here? At the bottom of this lake?

What started off to look like a random pattern to me, after some time made me lose all sense of direction, but my buddy seemed to know where to go. She only consults her compass to traverse sandy open spaces. That’s the moment I understand why she has the long fins. I can hardly keep up with her. We stop for a moment at one of the many statues. Not to admire its artistic features, but for the ‘vegetation’ that grows on it. These animals deserve a closer examination, because they are being photographed. That picture will not win in an underwater photography competition or be put on display at an exhibition. No, this digital immortalisation is for identification purposes and further study above water.

And that’s how it goes for more than an hour. In the end we admire a small school of carps. However, the fish find it too busy this evening and choose to swim away towards the protected area. A big pike leaves us a little more time to admire him (of is it a her?).

Although I’ve logged more than a hundred dives in this lake, I’ve learned a lot. The list of plants and animals that we have encountered is long: Asian mussels, shoot moth larvae, pond snails, pond spice, red water mites, zebra mussels, freshwater sponges, freshwater polyps, perch, tench, white koi…

On my next dive here, I will pay even more attention to my surroundings and enjoy it more. After all, knowledge brings understanding. I compare Kiki’s diving pattern with the pseudorandom walk of my family dog when he is sniffing around. A little bit of browsing here, a sniff there, a small investigation and then suddenly crossing the street to sniff something else. The same behaviour the whole walk of the forest. Soon we come up with a name for this kind of diving, ‘biology sniffing’. This term describes it well.

To conclude our dive, I enquire about Kiki’s most spectacular biology dive. That is without a doubt, the close encounter with a leopard seal in Antarctica. The briefing for that dive was loaded with warnings and a list of things you were not allowed to do. Not really something to reassure you before you hit the water. During the encounter with this intelligent predator, she could only have a high admiration for these animals and despite the special character of the dive, she wanted to get out of the water sooner rather than later. It was clear to her that as a diver you were on his terrain. You were the stranger; he was allowing you to visit him. Hearing that from somebody who has dived with sharks, gives it extra weight.

I thank Kiki for this introduction to her ‘biology sniffing’ dives and the chance for experiencing it. It is only one of many facets of our hobby that I have discovered. I leave the parking lot to head towards another buddy to learn of their special dive interests and techniques.

Do you know anyone who has a unique dive mission and wants to be my buddy on one of these dives? Or are you such a diver?

Then please get in touch with me by email: patrick.vanhoeserlande@nelos.be.

Kiki Vleeschouwers

2007

567

Moby Dick Diving Team

3 Star Diver

• Deep Diving Qualification up to 60m

• Basic Nitrox

• Underwater photographer Level 1

Underwater magnifying glass & underwater camera.

Put van Ekeren

Socorro, Mexico

A close encounter with a leopard seal in Antarctica.

FEATURE FERNANDO REIS PHOTOGRAPHY PHILIPPE LECOMTE

A few weeks ago an article in the North American press announced that due to global warming, Bull Sharks where changing latitudes from their usual nursery habitat areas into new North Carolina water areas, bringing with this change a lot of worry for the Outer Banks local beach goers. The Outer Banks are a long sequence of narrow, barrier-shaped islands off the coast of North Carolina, on the Eastern coast of the United States, and it happens to also be a subtropical touristic destination, known by a very rich and healthy, well maintained biodiversity zone.

On one side we have the bonus of discovering a new “nursery habitat” of Bull Sharks. On another side, we need to consider the general North-American publics’ opinion about sharks in general, mostly when they are close to the shore, which is the case in this new study.

After reading this publication, a series of thoughts on Bull Sharks came to mind. People are usually more afraid of these animals than any other sharks, with the exception of the Great Whites. But why is that? Let’s research a bit more about this special requiem Bull Shark, and see if is it possible to swim, or scuba dive with these sharks in a sustainable way.

The Bull Shark, Carcharhinus leucas, is one of the largest and most robust requiem sharks belonging to the Carcharhinidae family that comprises amongst others, the Tiger Shark, the Silky Shark and the Blacktip Reef Shark, but it is also one of the few elasmobranch species that is physiologically capable of living in freshwater habitats, especially when they are juveniles. Requiem sharks are the dominant group of sharks found in tropical and subtropical waters, and Bull Sharks are common in estuarine and riverine environments around the world as they have been recorded in numerous rivers and lakes from the US, Central and South America, Africa, Australia, Papua New Guinea, and Asia.

Although some other shark species may enter and ascend rivers for a short distance, only very few requiem shark species such as the Bull Shark appear to be the only living sharks that can live in freshwater for long periods. Bull Shark species are in fact quite remarkable for the apparent ease with which it can displace from saline to freshwater habitats and back again (Ebert and Fowler, 2014). They can indeed be found close inshore, in hypersaline lagoons, in river mouths, or hundreds of kilometres up warm rivers and freshwater lakes.

From its appearance, the Bull Shark is recognisable by its large broad head, with a very short and a rounded snout, small eyes, upper labial short furrows and without spiracles. Especially for Shark Divers, it is important to retain that its large and broad angular pectoral fins are used to choose the direction of their moves. Its skin is of a greybrown colour with dusky fin tips and a white ventral bellow. It really is an impressive and massive shark that can grow up to 3.4 metres in length.

In the last month of April while I was preparing a new Shark Diving Workshop, I came upon an article about some changes related to the nursery habitats of the Bull Shark species, probably another result of global warming. In reality, it seems that with the global waters warming trend, these Bull Sharks from the North American East coast have found new northern areas to have their offspring, where they will supposedly be more protected from their predators. But, in this instance, mother nature didn’t take into consideration that humans could also be their predators.

There are studies from the first decade of this century on Bull Sharks, that have identified distinct habitat partitioning within a South West Florida estuary with neonate and young-of-the-year individuals occupying different habitats from older juveniles. This comes out after a study conducted in the Caloosahatchee River, that researchers from the ‘Center for Shark Research’ in Florida, found that salinity was an important factor, with younger individuals occurring within lower salinity regions, and older juveniles utilising higher brackish salt water regions. Despite this adaptation, in general it was also confirmed that Bull Sharks within juvenile habitats are capable of tolerating changes in temperature, river flow rate and salinity rates despite the variable conditions they may be exposed in estuarine and river habitats. As this study presents, it suggests that sharks evolving in waters with strong human activities such as rivers, estuaries and close to ports, are highly susceptible to environment and anthropogenic habitat changes. As it has also been discovered that juvenile Bull Sharks using rivers as nursery areas are prone to swim upstream during the day and downstream at night, maintaining themselves in deep waters during the day, and swimming closer to the surface at night (Heupel et al, 2010).

These studies have also proven that juvenile C. leucas are very capable of tolerating changes in water temperature, river flow rate and salinity on the estuaries waters. Which also proves of course how resilient and how adaptable Bull Sharks can be. They consistently use their nursery space despite the variable environmental conditions which they are exposed to. The problem is that as juveniles, they are restricted to a small area, which can make them more vulnerable to human activities exploitation, and to loss of their prey populations. This is another reason why careful management and system regulations of these types of habitats, which act as nursery areas, are so important nowadays.

As with many other species, we can count on some adaption abilities of the juvenile Bull Sharks, as well as some surrounding natural factors, but of course we must be aware that we also need to remain alert with any changes in their habitat and environmental conditions.

Eight years later, new research led by Bangley et al (2018), from the ‘Institute for Coastal Science and Policy’, from the East Carolina University, found that the increased occurrence of juvenile Bull Sharks was strongly associated with increasing water temperatures and salinities, which occurred in early and late summer, respectively. These observed environmental changes become more important after 2011, when Bull Sharks get documented in northern regions of the US Atlantic Coast.

Environmental changes studied between 2003- 2016, have identified important relationships between the environmental measurements and the monthly presence of Bull Sharks in the Pamlico Sound area (Outer Banks in North Carolina). The researchers have also suggested that Bull Sharks have the potential to colonise new nursery habitats, which may make their populations resilient to large-scale disturbances such as climate change. As Bull Sharks have traditionally been considered dangerous to humans, an increase of Bull Sharks in those waters could also increment the human-shark interactions in the area, which brings more compelling reasons why we always need to know more about sharks, to learn to respect their habitats, and to be better prepared, and better trained in order to react properly in case of possible encounters.

Due to their triangular shaped teeth, Bull Sharks, together with Tiger Sharks and Great Whites, are unfortunately associated by some media by the expression, “shark attack”. The dominant perception of “attack” as intentional bites that end with fatal outcomes, is nowadays a generic and highly misleading term. As there are not many Shark Diver trained people, the lack of knowledge about how to behave when faced with a shark underwater, if a young Bull Shark happens to interact by accident with any beach goer, sad things may happen. The persistent use of the expression “shark attack”, mostly by some media and government representatives when describing any type of human-shark interaction, have also led to the criminalisation of all types of shark bites. This is so significant, that a few years ago two scientists, Christopher Neff from Australia and Robert Hueter from the USA, published a study regarding a reclassification of humanshark interactions.

Shark sightings in Sydney Harbour, Australia, registered by New South Wales Fisheries staff, revealed that Bull Sharks regularly swim close to hundreds of swimmers and ignore them all. In accordance with this, there have been so many observations of sharks in proximity to swimmers in the ocean without the animals showing any interest in people, that it has been considered convenient to reclassify all contacts between sharks and humans, as many forms of “shark attack” misrepresent the facts and misinforms the general public. These have been the reasons why Neff and Heuter had proposed a new system of four categories to be used in the classification of human-shark interactions.

I believe that if we removed the term “attack”, it would be possible to provide a model reporting the interactions that decriminalise sharks in the mind of the public that simultaneously create a more objective understanding of the relationship between humans and sharks in shared ocean spaces.

Sightings of sharks in the water in proximity to people with no physical human-shark contact taking place.

Human-shark interactions in which physical contact occurs between a shark and a person, or an inanimate object holding that person, and when no injury takes place. For example, shark bites on surfboards, kayaks, and boats would be classified under this label. A shark physically “bumping” a swimmer without biting might be included in this category.

Incidents where sharks bite people resulting in minor to moderate injuries. Small or large sharks might be involved, but only a single nonfatal bite occurs.

Human-shark conflicts in which serious injuries take place as a result of one or more bites on a person, causing a significant loss of blood and/or body tissue and a fatal outcome.

As it is known in the United States, Florida is often labelled as the “Shark Attack Capital of the World”. But, if we analyse the registered data of incidents with sharks that occurred off Florida beaches over a spam of 129 years, only less than 2% (11 cases in total) resulted in fatalities, and only 2 cases could be associated with Bull Sharks C. leucas. (Neff and Hueter, 2013).

So it is time now to stop using the expression “Shark Attack”. The worst stigma about sharks still based in the ignorance and in all the lack of awareness about shark behaviour in general, and about Bull Sharks in particular. Remember that the things the public know in general, come from Hollywood movies that today still translate to the “Jaws effect”. We should definitely start to acknowledge the public value of a better marine conservation education, and of a more balanced outcome based approach.

If you aim to one day dive with Bull Sharks, there are several sites around the world that can offer you the amazing experience. Without any doubt, I would recommend the Fiji Islands. There, you will find experienced sustainable dive operators that care not only about Bull Shark conservation, but also about shark population recuperation, and basing their work on the role sharks play on marine balance and for the entire reef biodiversity recovery. As you may know, the cascade effects of shark overfishing are tremendous over reef trophic chains. As these Bull Shark diving activities are based on baiting them, sharks have come back to certain exhausted areas on the reef. The general recovery started to gain form for the rest of the trophic nets with excellent long term results.

A couple of years ago, I was directing the Canary Islands International Underwater Film Festival where I met David Diley, the awarded British Filmmaker and Producer of the feature film ‘Of Shark And Man’, during his first public Director’s Cut presentation. Because of his film, sustainable Bull Shark diving in Fiji islands come across our talks at the time.

For the ancestral people of Fiji, sharks were considered gods that protected and guided people through the seas. So the respect the Fiji people have today for these animals is awesome. If you have the opportunity of visiting the Fiji seascapes someday, our advice is to pay attention to the briefing before the dive and to always follow the instructions given by the Divemaster or Dive Guide leading the operation. The native “shark divers” and especially the “shark feeders”, respect the Bull Sharks and they know the behaviours well. They are the first people that want sharks to be protected in Fiji waters. One curious fact during the feeding activities is that for safety reasons, Bull Sharks are taught to come from the left to the right of the shark feeder to get their tuna head. If they come to the “shark feeder” from the right side, they won’t get anything. The most amazing thing is that sharks learn very fast. They know their “shark feeders”, and how to behave from watching each other.

Another very important aspect to be learned when you dive with sharks is observing their pectoral fin position. Knowing what the pectoral fin positions mean will help you to know when a shark will turn, and in which direction. Comprehending this behaviour will help you to feel more comfortable when diving with sharks, as it can help understand a situation, or it can be a great tool for shark underwater photographers to take the photo they want.

When a shark wants to turn to its right, it simply pushes down its right pectoral fin, and if it wants to turn left, it pushes the left fin down. The lowering of a pectoral fin increases the lateral surface and generates a burst of speed. When we see a shark lowering one of its pectoral fins, we know in which direction it will veer. Sometimes we may also watch a situation in which a shark forms a hunched back, an appearance that results from lowering both pectoral fins at the same time. What does this mean? The reason is simple, the shark is preparing to be able to turn in every direction, probably because it may feel some threat around it, and it doesn’t know exactly which direction is going to be its safest option. That is definitely an animal that prepares to flee because it feels threatened. Remember, any behaviour is caused by a need. (Gospodinov, 2018).

Yes. It is possible to scuba dive in safety with Bull Sharks. If you like to swim in the open sea, you have most probably already swam with Bull Sharks, you just didn’t notice. If you find yourself in the water with a shark, remember to look the shark in the eyes, breathe slowly, stay calm, and face the shark at all times. It will know you have an eye on it.

Shark Divers should know exactly how to react in case of the second, third or fourth ‘Neff and Hueter’ level categories, but there’s one thing you can start doing from now on: never dive or swim alone, and if you suspect you are in shark waters, always survey your buddy’s back and vice-versa. Then, relax and enjoy any possible encounters. The truth is that they are more afraid of us, then we are of them.

For more information about shark behaviours and other sustainable shark diving activities, please email: info@sharksinstitute.org or sharksinstitute@gmail.com or visit the Sharks Educational Institute website at: www.sharksinstitute.org

REFERENCES: Bangley, C. W., Paramore, L., Shiffman, D. S., and Rulifson, R. A., 2018. Increased Abundance and Nursery Habitat Use of the Bull Shark (Carcharhinus leucas) in Response to a Changing Environment in a Warm-Temperate Estuary – Nature, Scientific Reports 8:6018.

Gospodinov, P., 2018. The Meaning of Shark Pectoral Fins Positions – Fundamentals I, II and III – Sharks Educational Institute (2018) 29 th March - 3 rd April - 21 st April.

Heupel, M. R., Yeiser, B. G., Collins, A. B., Ortega, L., and Simpfendorfer, C. A., 2010. Long-term presence and movement patterns of juvenile bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas, in an estuarine river system – CSIRO Publishing, Marine and Freshwater Research, 2010, 61, 1-10.

Neff, C., and Hueter, R., 2013. Science, policy, and the public discourse of shark “attack”: a proposal for reclassifying human–shark interactions – Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, (2013) 3:65-73.